Thursday, March 28, 2013

575-250-7400 - SCAM CALLER

575-250-7400 - unknown - page 1/2:

'via Blog this'Stop them from calling my cell! They have been calling the past fews days several times a day. Reported the number to BBB, hopfully they will stop them.
The caller was identified as an Unknown
Reported 27th, Mar. 2013. 
harrassed cell phopne owner
0
Disgusting... How come these companiies are allowed to call on your cell when you cell number is registered in Do NOT Call Registry. They don't leave a message and keep on calling several times a day and if you call back no one answers. I wish there is some way to get these call centers/ companies on radar and the nuisance stops
The caller was identified as a none

'Health Affairs' Study: One-Third of Doctors Won't Accept New Medicaid Patients - Forbes

'Health Affairs' Study: One-Third of Doctors Won't Accept New Medicaid Patients - Forbes:

'via Blog this'
"
Unsurprisingly, the best-paying states, like Wyoming and Alaska, also enjoyed broad physician acceptance of Medicaid, whereas poorly paying states, like New York, New Jersey, and California, had the opposite effect. Mostly, the blue states that have been most aggressive in expanding their Medicaid programs are the ones that have had to rein in costs by paying doctors less, leading to poorer Medicaid access.
Decker ends her piece on an optimistic note, pointing out that Obamacare temporary increases Medicaid’s fees for primary care physicians in 2013 and 2014. As Sarah Kliff observes, “some interest groups already have their eyes on an extension” of the fee bump. In the current fiscal environment, however, it’s hard to see how that fee bump would continue.
Indeed, in the absence of permanent reform, states are continuing to reduce, not increase, their Medicaid fees. States can’t borrow money from China, the way the federal government does. States are already cutting back on education and infrastructure spending in order to feed the Medicaid beast. As Obamacare strives to add 17 million more people to the Medicaid rolls, this problem is going to get worse, not better.
Follow Avik on Twitter at @aviksaroy.
UPDATE: Phil Galewitz of Kaiser Health News talks to a doctor in New Jersey, who says that the Medicaid fee bump won’t make a difference to him, because of its temporary nature:
Robert Maro Jr., a Cherry Hill, N.J. internist, said he has not accepted new Medicaid patients for 15 years because of low pay. He notes the state reimburses him only about $23.50 for a basic office visit, less than half of what he gets from Medicare or private insurers.
Maro said he treats Medicaid patients in the hospital and in nursing homes, but he would lose money treating them in the office where his administrative costs are higher.
He said he would start seeing new Medicaid patients only if knew the pay hike under the health law would continue beyond 2014.  Otherwise, he worries he would take on new patients only to see rates fall back to the old levels in 2015,  and then he would be required legally and ethically to keep treating them.
“That would be a nightmare,” he said…
New Jersey Medicaid officials acknowledge the lack of physician participation is a problem, but said the recent move to enroll nearly all Medicaid recipients into private managed care plans “should reverse the trend,” said Nicole Brossoie, spokeswoman for the New Jersey Department of Human Services which oversees Medicaid.
Many states have contracted with private managed care companies for the care of Medicaid patients to cut costs and improve care. Brossoie said those companies can pay higher rates to doctors to get them to join their networks, and the state holds the firms accountable for making sure members have access to providers.
New Jersey has not completed any studies measuring patients’ access to care in Medicaid managed care plans, Brossoie said.

Post Your Comment

Please  or sign up to comment.
Forbes writers have the ability to call out member comments they find particularly interesting. Called-out comments are highlighted across the Forbes network. You'll be notified if your comment is called out.
  • citizenbfkcitizenbfk 7 months ago
    What a surprise! (Not at all).
    • Called-out comment
  • Alex KnappAlex Knapp, Forbes Staff 7 months ago
    Avik, this is definitely an interesting data set, and I’m glad you took the time to dig into this study. But isn’t the headline a bit misleading? I mean, yes, 1/3 of doctors are rejecting Medicaid patients, but if 20% are ALSO rejecting privately insured patients, it seems to me that we have a serious supply problem. We have baseline of 20% of all PCPs who are turning down new customers. That screams: shortage of doctors.
    So if there’s a shortage of doctors, then of course, if you can pick and choose your customers, you’re going to take the patients who will give you more revenue. But the real headline here is that 20% of PCPs aren’t taking on new patients, period.
    • Called-out comment
  • Author
    Avik RoyAvik Roy, Contributor 7 months ago
    Hi Alex, that’s a good point — we do have an overall supply problem, which disproportionately affects people on government insurance, because it pays doctors less. In any market with limited supply, sellers migrate to higher prices, as you point out.
    As to the rate of private insurance rejection, I’m not ready to read too much into those numbers, because the 2008 study I cited shows a much wider discrepancy, using a more detailed methodology. But it will be interesting if we can uncover why the numbers differ.
    • Called-out comment
  • Alex KnappAlex Knapp, Forbes Staff 7 months ago
    I’d be interested in seeing that difference, too.
    Don’t mind me, though. I’m a big “we need more doctors” guy, so sometimes that’s all I see. Given how geographically diffuse the U.S. is, we should have more doctors per capita than dense European countries, not LESS…
    • Called-out comment
  • Kenan WalerKenan Waler 6 months ago
    American docs are tired of govt intervention. My dad is a doc, tired of high malpractice insurance, and has decidided to quit. BHO and libs don’t care if our health care goes to hell.
    • Called-out comment
  • sunforestersunforester 7 months ago
    Access to health care is no problem – all you have to do is pay for it. Those who expect a free ride should not be surprised at the resistance they get from the rest of us. Those who are gifted free rides by our political elite who then have the favor returned by grateful, greedy votes should not be surprised when the rest of us balk at being fleeced for their benefit.
    Our political elite have turned the act of so-called “charity” into one of patronage. Health care is NOT a right, it is a good that can be bought by anyone who cares to buy it. Lying to us and saying that access to health care is a right, when anyone who wants health care can get it simply by paying for it, is a deceitful and deceptive way to justify stealing our money for freeloading voters.
    Doctors are absolutely right to not accept Medicaid patients who think they are entitled to the best of care without paying for it. Our entitled voters who have been granted privileges by our political elite have to realize that we cannot afford to keep them in a manner to which they are very accustomed. It is time that we kick them off the dole and tell them they have to pay their own way.
    We the people will no longer be enslaved to our political elite who keep themselves in power by handing out our money to those who love all the free stuff they can get. We need to throw OUT every politician who takes our wealth and freedom for their own benefit. No more entitlements, no more free health care, no more free rides.
    • Called-out comment
  • Dawn DuffyDawn Duffy 7 months ago
    I can understand this applying to people who are able to work and collecting government benefits. Some of them know how to work the system and they do, but what about the elderly? Are you going to just toss them??
    My grandmother is almost 90 years old and my family is already shelling out $3000 a month for her assisted living (which does not include any health-related services) because her “life savings” was wiped out in the first year alone by that monthly rate. Should we make her get a job so she can pay for health insurance or just throw her out on the dole? Just saying.
    • Called-out comment
  • T HoldrenT Holdren 5 months ago
    If you can’t afford insurance and fall into poverty guidelines, then why would you consider it a “free ride?” Do you think that most of the poor want to be poor? Not knowing where their next meal is coming from or if they’ll be able to pay their bills!
    I despise people like you! And I’m sure you’ve never been poor! I’m sure the poor truly consider being poor, and getting crappy free insurance a real gift!
    • Called-out comment
  • Shane KaeoShane Kaeo 4 months ago
    Why don’t you just have her live with you? Seems like there is a problem but I ask why is it mine?
    • Called-out comment
  • Shane KaeoShane Kaeo 4 months ago
    I know some do. I also know some enjoy living on the street drinking till they get drunk. Now they are in luck for that kidney transplant that normal folks be in line for. We don’t have an unlimited amount of kidneys to go around but at least the poor drunk living on the streets makes the list now. Hope you don’t need a kidney soon.
    • Called-out comment