Sunday, July 1, 2012

List of books banned by governments

List of books banned by governments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

'via Blog this'
Banned books are books to which free access is not permitted. The practice of banning books is a form ofcensorship, and often has political, religious or moral motivations.

Contents

  [hide

[edit]Alphabetical list

TitleAuthorTypeReason
About a Silence in LiteratureŽivorad StojkovićEssayBanned in Yugoslavia by court order in 1951.[1]
A Feast for the Seaweeds (1983)Haidar HaidarNovelBanned in Egypt and several other Arab states, and even resulted in a belated angry reaction from the clerics of Al-Azhar University upon reprinting in Egypt in the year 2000. The clerics issued a Fatwa banning the novel, and accused Haidar of heresy and offending Islam. Al-Azhar University students staged huge protests against the novel, that eventually led to its confiscation.[2][3][4]
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland(1865)Lewis CarrollChildren's Novel/AdventureUsed to be banned in the province of Hunan, China, beginning in 1931 for its portrayal ofanthropomorphized animals acting on the same level of complexity as human beings. The censor General Ho Chien believed that attributing human language to animals was an insult to humans. He feared that the book would teach children to regard humans and animals on the same level, which would be "disastrous."[5]
All Quiet on the Western Front(1929)Erich Maria RemarqueAnti-war novelBanned in Nazi Germany for being demoralizing and insulting to the Wehrmacht.[6]
American Psycho(1991)Bret Easton EllisFiction novelSale and purchase was banned in the AustralianState of Queensland. Now available in public libraries and for sale to people 18 years and older. Sale restricted to persons at least 18 years old in the other Australian states.[7]
Angaray (1932)Sajjad ZaheerProgressive short storiesBanned in India in 1936 by the British government.[8]
Animal Farm(1945)George OrwellPolitical novellaDuring 1943 – 45, Allied forces found this entire book to be critical of the U.S.S.R., and therefore the text was considered to be too controversial to print during wartime. Publishers were reluctant to print the novel then. A play of Animal Farm was banned in Kenya in 1991, because it criticizes corrupt leaders.[9] In 2002, the novel was banned in the schools of the United Arab Emirates, because it contained text or images that goes against Islamic values, most notably the occurrence of an anthropomorphic, talking pig.[9]
Areopagitica(1644)John MiltonEssayBanned in the Kingdom of England for political reasons.[10]
Auf der Universität(1863)Theodor StormNovelBanned for distribution within the South Korean military as one of 23 books banned there beginning on Aug 1, 2008.
Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism (2008)Ha-Joon ChangNon-FictionOne of 23 books from Aug 1st 2008 Banned for distribution in South Korean military.[11]
BibleJewish and ChristianReligious textCensored in dozens of countries, both historically and in the current era. Currently, the Bible is banned or greatly restricted in a number of countries[original research?] including North Korea[12] and Eritrea [6]. Sometimes, the ban is on distributing the Bible in certain languages or versions. In 1234, King James I of Aragon ordered the burning of Bibles in the vernacular.[13]
Big River, Big Sea — Untold Stories of 1949 (2009)Lung Ying-taiNon-FictionIt sold over 100,000 copies in Taiwan and 10,000 in Hong Kong in its first month of release, but discussion of her work was banned in mainland China following the book launch.[14]
Black Beauty(1877)Anna SewellNovelIt is a popular misconception that it was banned in South Africa during the apartheid era for having the word "black" in its title.[15]
Borstal Boy(1958)Brendan BehanAutobiographical NovelBanned in Ireland in 1958. The Irish Censorship of Publications Board was not obliged to reveal its reason but it is believed that it was rejected for its critique of Irish republicanism and the Catholic Church, and its depiction of adolescent sexuality. It was banned in Australia and New Zealand shortly after. It was allowed to be published in New Zealand in 1963.[16]
Brave New World(1932)Aldous HuxleyNovelBanned in Ireland in 1932, due to alleged references of sexual promiscuity.[17]
Burger's Daughter (1979)Nadine GordimerNovelBanned in South Africa in July, 1979 for going against the government's racial policies; the ban was reversed in October of the same year.[9]
Candide (1759)VoltaireNovelSeized by US Customs in 1930 for obscenity.[18]
The Canterbury Tales (late 14th century)Geoffrey ChaucerStory CollectionBanned from the U.S. mail under the Federal Anti-Obscenity Act (Comstock Law) of 1873, which banned the sending or receiving of works containing "obscene," "filthy," or "inappropriate" material.[18]
Catch-22 (1961)Joseph HellerNovelBanned in several states: in 1972, it was banned in Srongsville, Ohio (overturned in 1976); in 1974, it was banned in Dallas, Texas, and in 1979 it was banned in Snoqualmie, Washington.[19][why?]
The Country Girls(1960)Edna O'BrienNovelBanned by Ireland's censorship board in 1960 for its explicit sexual content.[20][21]
Curved River(1963)Živojin Pavlovićstory collectionIn 1963 in Yugoslavia withdrawn by the publisher (Nolit) at request of SDB officials.[22]
The Da Vinci Code (2003)Dan BrownNovelBanned in Lebanon after Catholic leaders deemed it offensive to Christianity. (See Inaccuracies in The Da Vinci Code.)[23]
The Dark (1965)John McGahernNovelBanned in Ireland for obscenity.[24]
The Death of Lorca (1971)Ian GibsonBiography, True crimeBanned briefly in Spain.[25]
The Decameron(1350–1353)Giovanni BoccaccioAllegoryBanned from the U.S. mail under the Federal Anti-Obscenity Act (Comstock Law) of 1873, which banned the sending or receiving of works containing "obscene," "filthy," or "inappropriate" material.[18]
The Diary of Anne Frank(1947)Anne FrankBiographyBanned in Lebanon for "portray[ing] Jews, Israel or Zionism favorably".[26]
The Truth About Muhammad(2006)Robert SpencerNonfictionThe government of Pakistan confiscated all copies of the book and banned it on 20 December 2006 citing "objectionable material" as the cause.[27]Spencer responded that the book does not assert anything that is not readily verifiable in the sources he provides.[28]
Dictionary of Modern Serbo-Croatian LanguageMiloš MoskovljevićdictionaryBanned in Yugoslavia by court order in 1966, at request of Mirko Tepavac, because "some definitions can cause disturbance among citizens".[22]
Doctor Zhivago(1957)Boris PasternakNovelBanned within the U.S.S.R until 1988 for its anti-war theme for the Russian Civil War, and criticism of Stalinism.
Droll Stories(1832–37)Honoré de BalzacBanned for obscene material of a sexual nature in Canada in 1914 and Ireland in 1953, the ban was lifted in Ireland in 1967.[29][30]
The Devil's Discus (1964)Rayne KrugerBanned in Thailand in 2006[31]
El Señor Presidente(1946)Miguel Ángel AsturiasNovelBanned in Guatemala because it went against the ruling political leaders.[32]
Fanny Hill orMemoirs of a Woman of Pleasure (1748)John ClelandNovelBanned in the U.S.A. in 1821 for obscenity, then again in 1963. This was the last book ever banned in the U.S.A.[6] See also Memoirs v. Massachusetts.
The Federal Mafia (1992)Irwin SchiffNonfictionAn injunction was issued by a U.S. District Court in Nevada under 26 U.S.C. § 7408 against Irwin Schiff and associates Cynthia Neun and Lawrence Cohen, against the sale of this book by those persons as the court found that the information it contains is fraudulent[33]
Frankenstein(1818)Mary ShelleyNovelBanned in apartheid South Africa in 1955 for containing "obscene" or "indecent" material.[18]
The Fugitive (Perburuan)(1950)Pramoedya Ananta ToerNovelBanned in Indonesia in 1950, for containing "subversive" material, including an attempt to promote Marxist-Leninist thought and other Communist theories. As of 2006, the ban is still in effect.[9]
The First Circle(1968)Aleksandr SolzhenitsynNovelAfter Nikita Khrushchev was removed from power in 1964, all current and future works by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn were banned in the Soviet Union. This work details the lives of scientists forced to work in a Stalinist research center.[34]
The Global Trap(1996)Hans-Peter Martin andHarold SchumannNonfictionBanned for distribution within the South Korean military as one of 23 books banned there beginning on August 2008.
The Grapes of Wrath (1939)John SteinbeckNovelWas temporarily banned in many places in the US. In the region of California in which it was partially set, it was banned for its alleged unflattering portrayal of area residents.[35]
Green Eggs and Ham (1960)Dr. SeussNovelIn 1965, the children's novel was temporarily banned in the People's Republic of China for its portrayal of early Marxism. The ban was lifted in 1991, following Seuss' death.[36]
Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle With India (2011)Joseph LelyveldBiographyIs currently banned in Gujarat, a state in western India, for suggesting that Mahatma Gandhi had a homosexual relationship. Gujarat's state assembly voted unanimously in favour of the ban in April, 2011.[37]
The Gulag Archipelago(1973)Aleksandr SolzhenitsynNonfictionBanned in the Soviet Union because it went against the image the Soviet Government tried to project of itself and its policies.[38] However available to public in the Soviet Union since at least the 1980s. In 2009, the Education Ministry of Russia addedThe Gulag Archipelago to the curriculum for high-school students.[39]
How to make disposable silencers (1984)Desert and Eliezer FloresHow toAn example of a class of books banned in Australia that "promote, incite or instruct in matters of crime or violence".[40][41]
Howl (1955)Allen GinsbergPoemCopies of the first edition seized by San Francisco Customs for obscenity in March 1957; after trial, obscenity charges were dismissed.[42]
The Hoax of the Twentieth CenturyArthur ButzNon-fictionClassified as "hate literature" in Canada with Royal Canadian Mounted Police destroying copies as recently as 1995.[43]
Islam – A Concept of Political World Invasion (2003)R. V. BhasinPolitical IdeologyBanned in Maharashtra, India in 2007, after its publishing on grounds that it promotes communal disharmony between Hindus and Muslims.[44][45]
July's People(1981)Nadine GordimerNovelBanned during the Apartheid-era in South Africa.[46] July's People is now included in the South African school curriculum.[47]
Jinnah: India-Partition-Independence(2009)Jaswant SinghBiographyTemporarily banned in Gujarat, India in August 2009.[48] The ban was overturned by the Gujarat High Court in December 2009.[49]
Jinnah of Pakistan (1982)Stanley WolpertBiographyBanned in Pakistan for recounting Jinnah’s taste for wine and pork.[50]
Jæger – i krig med eliten(2009)Thomas RathsackAutobiographyThe Danish military tried to ban the book September 2009 for national security reasons; a court rejected the ban as the book was already leaked in the press and on the Internet.[51]
The Jungle(1906)Upton SinclairNovelIn 1956, it was banned in East Germany for its incompatibility with Communism.[15]
The King Never Smiles (2006)Paul M. HandleyBiographyBanned in Thailand for its criticism of King Bhumibol Adulyadej.[52]
Lady Chatterley's Lover (1928)D. H. LawrenceNovelTemporarily banned in the United States and the United Kingdom for violation of obscenity laws; both bans were lifted in 1959 and 1960, respectively.[30]
Temporarily banned in Australia.[53]
Lajja (1993)Taslima NasrinNovelBanned in Bangladesh,[54][55] and a few states of India.
Lethal MarriageNick PronTrue CrimeWritten by a newspaper reporter this book allegedly contains inaccuracies, additionally, complaints were received by the St. Catharineslibrary board from the mother of a victim that led to the book being removed from all public library branches in the city.[43] As recently as 1999 this book was still unavailable to public library patrons in St. Catherines.[43]
Little Black Sambo (1899)Helen BannermanChildren's BookBanned in Japan (1988–2005) to quell "political threats to boycott Japanese cultural exports", although the pictures were not those of the original version.[56]
Lolita (1955)Vladimir NabokovNovelFrench officials banned it for being "obscene," as did the United Kingdom, Argentina, New Zealand (uncensored 1964) and South Africa.[57]
Banned in Canada in 1958, though the ban was later lifted.[58]
The Lonely Girl(1962)Edna O'BrienNovelBanned in Ireland in 1962 after Archbishop John Charles McQuaid complained personally to Justice Minister Charles Haughey that it "was particularly bad".[21]
The Lottery(1948)Shirley JacksonShort StoryBanned in South Africa during Apartheid.[59]
Lysistrata (411 BC)AristophanesScriptBanned in 1967 in Greece because of its anti-war message.[18]
Madame Bovary(1856)Gustave FlaubertNovelFlaubert's novel was banned and he was prosecuted for "offenses against public morals".[60]
Mein Kampf(1925)Adolf HitlerPolitical ideologyBanned in some European nations and the Russian Federation as extremist.[61]
In Germany, the copyright of the book is claimed by the Free State of Bavaria and Bavarian authorities to prevent any re-printing. It is legal to own or distribute existing copies.
In Austria, the Verbotsgesetz 1947 prohibits the printing of the book. It is illegal to own or distribute existing copies.[62] The law (§ 3 d.) states that, "Whoever publicly or before several people, through the printing of disseminated writings or illustrations to one of under § 1 or § 3 prohibited acts requests, strives or seeks to induce others, especially for the purpose of glorifying or advertising the aims of the Nazi Party, its institutions or measures, provided that it does not constitute a serious criminal offense, will be punished with imprisonment from five to ten years, or up to twenty years for offenders who themselves or their actions are deemed especially dangerous."
The Meritorious Price of Our Redemption(1650)William PynchonReligious ideologyThe first book banned in the New World (1650.) Pynchon, a prominent leader of the Massachusetts Bay Colony who, in 1636, founded the City ofSpringfield, Massachusetts beside the Connecticut River, wrote this explicit criticism of Puritanism, published in London in 1650. That year, several copies made their way back to the New World. Pynchon, who resided in Springfield, was unaware that his book suffered the New World's first book burning on the Boston Common. Accused of heresyby the Massachusetts General Court, Pynchon quietly transferred ownership of the Connecticut River Valley's largest land-holdings to his son, and then suffered indignities as he left the New World for England. Trivia: firsts work banned in Boston.[63]
My Secret Life"Walter" (pseudonym)NovelErotic novel purporting to chronicle the wild private sex life of a Victorian gentleman.
The Metamorphosis(1915)Franz KafkaNovelBanned in Nazi Germany.[citation needed]
A Message to Man and HumanityAleksandar CvetkovićBanned in Yugoslavia by court order in 1967 for "false and wicked claims, and enemy propaganda that supports pro-Chinese politics".[22]
Mirror of the Polish Crown(1618)Sebastian MiczyńskiAnti-Semitic pamphletBecause this pamphlet published in 1618 was one of the causes of the anti-Jewish riots in Cracow, it was banned by Sigismund III Vasa.[64]
Moll Flanders or The Fortunes and Misfortunes of the Famous Moll Flanders (1722)Daniel DefoeNovelBanned from the U.S. mail under the Federal Anti-Obscenity Act (Comstock Law) of 1873, which banned the sending or receiving of works containing "obscene," "filthy," or "inappropriate" material[65]
The Mountain Wreath (1847)Petar II Petrović-NjegošDrama in verseBanned in Bosnia schools by Carlos Westendorp.[66]
Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan's Military Economy(2007)Ayesha SiddiqaNovelBanned by the government of Pakistan for a short period due to political matters.[citation needed]
Naked Lunch(1959)William S. BurroughsNovelBanned by Boston courts in 1962 for obscenity, but that decision was reversed in 1966 by theMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.[67]
Nari (1992)Humayun AzadCriticismBanned in Bangladesh, from November 19, 1995 to March 7, 2000) because the book analyzes religious doctrine.
New Class (1957)Milovan ĐilasBanned in Yugoslavia by court order in 1957; author sentenced for enemy propaganda to seven years in prison, prolonged to 13 years in 1962.[22]
The Nickel-Plated-Feet Gang During the OccupationSuccessors of Louis Forton (1879–1934)comic bookBanned in Yugoslavia by court order in 1945.[1]
Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949)George OrwellNovelBanned by the Soviet Union in 1950, as Stalin understood that it was a satire based on his leadership. It was nearly banned by U.S.A. and UK in the early 1960s during the Cuban Missile Crisis. It was not until 1990 that the U.S.S.R. legalised the book and it was re-released after editing.[68]
Noli Me Tangere (novel) (1887)José_RizalNovelThis novel and its sequel, El filibusterismo(1891) were banned in some parts of the Philippines because of their portrayal of corruption and abuse by the country's former Spanish government and clergy. The book resulted to the Philippine Revolution of 1896. The ban was lifted years thereafter.
Notre ami le roi(1993)Gilles PerraultBiography ofHassan II of MoroccoBanned in Morocco. This book is a biography of King Hassan and examines cases of torture, killing and political imprisonment said to have been carried out by the Moroccan Government.[69]
Not Without My Daughter (1991)Betty MahmoodyNovelBanned in Iran. It is a real life story of an American citizen's escape along with her daughter from the clutches of her husband in Iran. It created furor in Iran for showing the general conditions there in bad light as well as for being critical of Iranian customs.[citation needed]
Nine Hours To Rama (1962)Stanley WolpertNovelBanned in India. It exposes persons responsible for security lapses that led to Mohandas Gandhi'sassassination.[citation needed]
The Naked and the Dead (1948)Norman MailerNovelBanned in Canada in 1949 for "obscenity."[70]
On Fierce Wound – Fierce HerbRatko ZakićWithdrawn from sales and destroyed after the decision of the Municipal Committee of the League of Communists of Kraljevo in KraljevoYugoslavia in 1967.[22]
On the Origins and Perpetual Use of the Legislative Powers of the Apostolic Kings of Hungary in Matters Ecclesiastical.(1764)Adam F. KollárLegal-politicalBanned in the Papal States for arguments against the political role of the Roman Catholic Church.[71]Original title: De Originibus et Usu perpetuo.
One Day of Life(1980)Manlio ArguetaNovelBanned by El Salvador for its portrayal of human rights violations.[72]
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich (1962)Alexander SolzhenitsynNovelBanned from publication in the Soviet Union in 1964.[9]
Operation Dark Heart (2010)Army Reserve Lt. Col.Anthony ShafferMemoirIn September 2010 the U.S. Department of Defense overrode the Army's January approval for publication. The DoD then purchased and destroyed all 9,500 first edition copies citing concerns that it contained classified information which could damage the integrity of U.S. National Security. The publisher, St. Martin's Press,[73] in conjunction with the DoD created a censored second edition; which contains blackened out words, lines, paragraphs, and even portions of the index.[74]
The Peaceful Pill Handbook (2007)Philip Nitschke and Fiona StewartInstructional manual oneuthanasiaInitially banned in New Zealand by Office of Film & Literature Classification since it was deemed to be objectionable.[75] In May 2008 an edited version of the book was allowed for sale if sealed and an indication of the censorship classification was displayed. The book was initially restricted in Australia:[76] after review the 2007 edition was banned outright.[41][77][78]
Pedagogy of the Oppressed(1968)Paulo FreireEducation—Philosophy textBanned in Arizona schools in 2010[79]
Peyton Place(1956)Grace MetaliousNovelBanned in Canada from 1956–1958.[58]
Rangila Rasul(1927)Pt. ChamupatiReligiousCurrently banned in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.[80]
Rights of Man(1791)Thomas PainePoliticalBanned in the U.K and author charged with treason for supporting the French Revolution.[18] Banned in Tsarist Russia after the Decembrist revolt.[81]
Rowena Goes Too Far (1931)H. C. AsterleyFictionBanned in Australia due to customs belief that it “lacked sufficient claim to the literary to excuse the obscenity”[82]
The Satanic Verses (1988)Salman RushdieNovelBanned in the following countries for alleged blasphemy against Islam: Bangladesh, Egypt, India, Iran, Kenya, Kuwait, Liberia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Pakistan, Senegal, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Thailand, and Turkey.[83][84]
Snorri the Seal(1941)Frithjof SælenFableSatirical book banned during the German occupation of Norway.[85]
Soft Target: How the Indian Intelligence Service Penetrated Canada (1989)Zuhair Kashmeri & Brian McAndrewInvestigative journalismBanned in India.[86]
The Song of the Red Ruby (1956)Agnar MykleNovelBanned in Norway in 1957 for its explicit sexual content. The ban was lifted by the Supreme Courtin 1958.[citation needed]
Smash and Grab: Annexation of Sikkim (1984)Sunanda Datta-RayNon-fictionBanned in India. Describes the process of the annexation of the Buddhist kingdom of Sikkim by the Indian government of Indira Gandhi in 1975.[citation needed]
A Spoon on EarthHyeon Gi-yeongNovelBanned for distribution within the South Korean military as one of 23 books banned there beginning on August 2008.[11][87]
Spycatcher(1985)Peter WrightAutobiographyBanned in the U.K 1985–1988 for revealing secrets. Wright was a former MI5 intelligence officer and his book was banned before it was even published in 1987.[88][89]
Storytellers IIBoško NovakovićStory collectionWithdrawn from print in Yugoslavia in 1964 because it contained stories by Dragiša Vasić.[22]
Suicide mode d'emploi (1982)Claude GuillonEssayThis book, reviewing recipes for committing suicide, was the cause of a scandal in France in the 1980s, resulting in the enactment of a law prohibiting provocation to commit suicide and propaganda or advertisement of products, objects or methods for committing suicide.[90] Subsequent reprints were thus illegal. The book was cited by name in the debates of the French National Assembly when examining the bill.[91]
ThaliaArius (AD 250 or 256 – 336)Book/PoemBanned in the Roman Empire in the 330s+ for contradicting Trinitarianism. All of Arius writings were ordered burned and Arius exiled, and presumably assassinated for his writings.[92]Banned by the Catholic Church for the next thousand plus years.[citation needed]
The True Furqan(1999)"Al Saffee" and "Al Mahdee"Religious textImport into India prohibited on the grounds of threatening national security.[93]
Tropic of Cancer(1934)Henry MillerNovel (fictionalized memoir)Banned in the U.S.A in the 1930s until the early 1960s, seized by US Customs for sexually explicit content and vulgarity. The rest of Miller's work was also banned by the United States.[94] Also banned in South Africa until the late 1980s.[citation needed]
The Turner Diaries (1978)William Luther PierceNovelBanned in Germany for its Nazi ideology theme and Pierce leadership in the National Alliance. Blamed for a number of crimes allegedly inspired by the novel.[95] Also effectively banned in Canada as recently as 1996 with Canada Customs turning back shipments at the border.[43] Presumably this is because Canada bans the importation of material meeting their definition of "hate propaganda."[96]
Ulysses (1922)James JoyceNovelBanned in UK until the 1930s[97] and in Australia during the 1930s and 1940s.[citation needed]Challenged and temporarily banned in the U.S.A for its sexual content. In 1933 the ban was overturned in United States v. One Book Called Ulysses.[98]
Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852)Harriet Beecher StoweNovelBanned in the Southern United States during the Civil War due to its anti-slavery content. In 1852,Uncle Tom's Cabin was banned in Russia under the reign of Nicholas I due to the idea of equality it presented, and for its "undermining religious ideals."[9]
Understanding Islam through Hadis (1982)Ram SwarupCritique of political IslamBanned in India.[99]
United States – Vietnam Relations: 1945–1967 (1971)Robert McNamara and the United States Department of DefenseGovernment StudyAlso known as the Pentagon Papers. US PresidentNixon attempted to suspend publication of classified information. The restraint was lifted by the US Supreme Court in a 6–3 decision.[100] See also New York Times Co. v. United States.
Uten en tråd(1966)Jens BjørneboeNovelPublished in 1966, banned in Norway for its explicit sexual content. The ban was later lifted.[citation needed]
Unarmed Victory(1963)Bertrand RussellBanned in India. Contains unflattering details of the 1962 Sino-Indian War.[101]
Various worksShen Congwen(1902–1988)Novels"Denounced by the Communists and Nationalists alike, Mr. Shen saw his writings banned in Taiwan, while mainland [China] publishing houses burned his books and destroyed printing plates for his novels. .... So successful was the effort to erase Mr. Shen's name from the modern literary record that few younger Chinese today recognize his name, much less the breadth of his work. Only since 1978 has the Chinese Government reissued selections of his writings, although in editions of only a few thousand copies. .... In China, his passing was unreported."[102]
WatershedČeda VukovićSelf-banned by the publisher Nolit in Yugoslavia in 1968.[22]
The Well of Loneliness (1928)Radclyffe HallNovelBanned in the U.K in 1928 for its lesbian theme, republished in 1949.[103]
What Uncle Sam Really Wants(2002)Noam ChomskyPoliticsBanned for distribution within the South Korean military as one of 23 books banned there beginning on August 2008.
White Niggers of America (1970)Pierre VallièresPolitical workWritten about Quebec politics and society, was written while the author was in jail. An edition published in France was not allowed into Canada; an edition was published in the U.S. in 1971[43]
Year 501: The Conquest Continues (1993)Noam ChomskyPoliticsBanned for distribution in South Korean military as one of 23 books banned on August 1, 2008.[11]
Zhuan Falun(1993)Li HongzhiSpiritualBanned in Mainland China[104]

[edit]See also

Monsanto's Seedy Legacy | Global Research TV

Monsanto's Seedy Legacy | Global Research TV:

'via Blog this'

Death Penalty & Criminal Justice System | Change.org

Petitions Covering the Death Penalty & Criminal Justice System | Change.org:

'via Blog this'

Biological warfare: Secret weapon testing. - YouTube

Biological warfare: Secret weapon testing. - YouTube:

'via Blog this'

Reckless Infliction of Emotional Distress in Tn

TBAToday Newsletter 06-20-2012 | Tennessee Bar Association:

'via Blog this'

computer.

(How hard would it be to get people to testify that this dude recklessly inflicts emotional distress? This lawyer is not doing his job if he can't prove that easy as pie.)


TN Supreme Court

BETTY SAINT ROGERS v. LOUISVILLE LAND COMPANY ET AL.
CORRECTION: On page 7, footnote 6, first sentence, "reckless intention of emotional distress" is changed to "reckless infliction of emotional distress"
Court: TN Supreme Court
Attorneys:
James F. Logan, Jr., Cleveland, Tennessee, for the appellant, Betty Saint Rogers.
David F. Hensley, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellees, Louisville Land Company and Joe V. Williams, III.
Judge: LEE
In this appeal, the defendants seek a review of the trial court’s decision to award the plaintiff compensatory and punitive damages based on the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of inadequate maintenance of the cemetery where the plaintiff’s son was buried. To recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s conduct was either intentional or reckless, was so outrageous that it is not tolerated by civilized society, and caused a serious mental injury to the plaintiff. The primary question presented is whether the plaintiff in this action proved the requisite serious mental injury to support the trial court’s award of compensatory and punitive damages. We hold that the plaintiff’s proof was deficient. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

TN Workers Comp Appeals

JOE SISSOM v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.
Court: TN Workers Comp Appeals
Attorneys:
Gerald L. Ewell, Jr., Tullahoma, Tennessee, for the appellant, Joe Sissom.
Timothy Pirtle, McMinnville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
Judge: KURTZ
The employee alleged that he injured his right shoulder while working for the employer. The trial court found that the employee’s thoracic outlet syndrome stemmed from a congenital abnormality and not a work-related injury. The employee has appealed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

TN Court of Appeals

LAURIE JO EDWARDS v. GARY WAYNE EDWARDS
Court: TN Court of Appeals
Attorneys:
Bert W. McCarter, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, Laurie Jo Edwards.
Michelle Blaylock-Howser, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellee, Gary Wayne Edwards.
Judge: COTTRELL
Wife was granted divorce on the grounds of Husband’s inappropriate marital conduct. The trial court distributed the marital property and awarded Wife transitory alimony for four years. Wife appealed, arguing she should have been awarded a larger portion of the marital estate and was entitled to alimony in futuro. She also argued she should have been awarded her attorneys’ fees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects. The trial court equitably distributed the marital assets and did not abuse its discretion in awarding Wife transitional alimony to help her adjust to living as a single person again.

JAMES JOHNSON AND WIFE, ELAINE JOHNSON v. THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, ET AL.
Court: TN Court of Appeals
Attorneys:
James Campbell Bradshaw, Michael David Hornback, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, The Torrington Company.
George Benson Boston, Christopher V. Sockwell, Ryan Perry Durham, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee, for the appellees, James Johnson and wife, Elaine Johnson.
Judge: COTTRELL
The plaintiff was severely injured while working on the premises of his employer. Because the employer was immune from liability in tort under the Workers’ Compensation statutes, the employee’s negligence suit named as defendants two other companies whose equipment was implicated in his injury. After a five-day trial, the jury found that the employer was solely at fault for the plaintiff’s injuries, resulting in no award. The plaintiff then filed a motion for new trial. The trial court granted the motion ten months after it was filed, declaring that in his capacity as the thirteenth juror he had found the verdict to be against the weight of the evidence. The case was tried before a second jury, which reached a different verdict, finding that one of the defendant companies was 90% at fault for the plaintiff’s injury while the plaintiff himself was 10% at fault. The net verdict for the plaintiff amounted to $2,925,000. The defendant company argues on appeal that the trial court erred in vacating the first jury verdict, that the second jury verdict was “contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence,” and that the amount of the verdict was excessive. We affirm the jury verdict and the judgment based on it.

IN RE: PAYTON A.D.L., (d.o.b. 02/26/2011), A Child Under Eighteen (18) Years of Age
Court: TN Court of Appeals
Attorneys:
Rolfe A. Straussfogel, Sevierville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Tiffany E. P.
Robert L. Huddleston, Maryville, Tennessee, Guardian ad Litem for the appellee, Payton A.D.L.
Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter and Joshua Davis Baker, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Children’s Services.
Judge: FARMER
This is a termination of parental rights case. Mother argues that the evidence presented to the trial court did not clearly and convincingly establish that termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of the child. After thoroughly reviewing the record, we affirm.

LYNN ROGERS v. JON ROACH, ET AL.
Court: TN Court of Appeals
Attorneys:
Matthew Allen Jared, Cookeville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Lynn Rogers.
James Frank Wilson, Wartburg, Tennessee, for the appellees, Jon Roach and wife, Brenda Roach, Roger Hill, Larry B. Daniels, Lowell D. Daniels, Wanda Brown, and Beulah Hill.
Judge: COTTRELL
Landowner owns property that was once part of a single parcel of land. The only way she can access her property is over a gravel roadway approximately nine feet wide that crosses through her neighbors’ property. One of Landowner’s neighbors erected fence posts near the roadway that Landowner alleges interfere with her ability to pull her horse trailers back and forth to her property. Landowner filed a complaint alleging she has the right to a forty foot easement across her neighbors’ property. After Landowner presented her proof at trial, Defendant neighbors moved for involuntary dismissal pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 41.02. The trial court dismissed Landowner’s complaint. We reverse the dismissal as to the Landowner’s claim for interference with her use and enjoyment of the easement because she presented evidence to establish the elements of that claim. We also reverse the dismissal of the claim for damages resulting from the interference. Dismissal of the other claims by Landowner is affirmed. We remand this case for further proceedings.

JEFFREY R. SMITH, ET AL. v. RICHARD GARVIN AND SERENA GARVIN
Court: TN Court of Appeals
Attorneys:
John Patrick Cauley, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellants, Richard Garvin and Serena Garvin.
Jeffrey Russell Smith, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellees, Jeffrey R. Smith, Vickie L. Smith, Ken Lamberson, Paula Lamberson, Anthony Langeland, and Melissa Langeland.
Judge: COTTRELL
Homeowners in a subdivision used water from a sulfur well to water their lawn. Neighbors complained about the noxious odor, and when the Homeowners continued to use the sulfurous water, the neighbors sought and obtained an order permanently enjoining them from using their well for irrigation purposes. Three years later the Homeowners began using the sulfur well to water their lawn again, and the neighbors filed a petition seeking to hold the Homeowners in contempt for violating the court’s order. The Homeowners filed a retaliatory complaint against the neighbors, and the neighbors sought Rule 11 sanctions for having to defend that action. The trial court consolidated the hearing of the two motions, and following a hearing where testimony and documentary evidence were introduced, the court found the Homeowners had willfully violated the court’s order on at least nine occasions. The court also found the Homeowners’ action was filed in violation of Rule 11 and fined the Homeowners $1,000. The Homeowners appealed, claiming the two motions should not have been heard together and that the evidence did not support the court’s finding of willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in hearing the two motions in the same proceeding, and that the evidence was not insufficient for the court to have found the Homeowners guilty of willfully violating its earlier order beyond a reasonable doubt. We thus affirm the trial court’s judgment.

TN Court of Criminal Appeals

JOHN R. GREEN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals
Attorneys:
John R. Green, Clifton, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; David H. Findley, Senior Counsel; Amy P. Weirich, District Attorney General and Rachel Newton, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: MCMULLEN
The Petitioner-Appellant, John R. Green, appeals the post-conviction court’s denial of his second petition for post-conviction relief, which the court treated as a motion to reopen his first petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, the petitioner does not address any of the procedural issues for which the post-conviction court denied the second petition. He instead argues, as he did in his first petition for post-conviction relief, that he received the ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on a failure to communicate a plea offer and to present a defense at trial. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DOYLE EVERETTE HANEY
Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals
Attorneys:
A. Philip Lomonaco (at trial), Knoxville, Tennessee, and Candice K. Mendez (on appeal), Dandrige, Tennessee, for the appellant, Doyle Everette Haney.
Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Cameron L. Hyder, Assistant Attorney General; James B. Dunn, District Attorney General; and Joe C. Crumley, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: THOMAS
Following a jury trial, the Defendant, Doyle Everette Haney, was convicted of criminal responsibility for the facilitation of the sale of .5 grams or more of cocaine, a Class C felony, and delivery of .5 grams or more of cocaine, a Class B felony. The trial court merged the two convictions and imposed a sentence of thirty years as a career offender. On appeal, the Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions, the consistency of the verdicts, the jury instructions, and sentencing. All of his issues could be treated as waived for failure to comply with the requirements for appellate briefs. See Tenn. Ct. Crim. App. R. 10(b). However, after a review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KOMOYANGI KOMOYANGI
Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals
Attorneys:
Stephen C. Bush, District Public Defender; Tony N. Brayton (on appeal) and Constance Barnes (at trial), Assistant Public Defenders, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Defendant- Appellant, Komoyangi Komoyangi.
Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Leslie E. Price, Assistant Attorney General; Amy P. Weirich, District Attorney General; and Robert Ratton, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: MCMULLEN
A Shelby County jury convicted the Defendant-Appellant, Komoyangi Komoyangi, of assault, a Class A misdemeanor, and he was sentenced to serve eleven months and twentynine days in confinement. The sole issue presented for our review is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction given Komoyangi’s theory of self-defense. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Bass Berry Explains Rationale for DC Office
The Nashville-based firm of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC recently opened an office in Washington, D.C. Explaining the decision, Brook Lathram, a member in the firm’s Memphis office, told the Memphis Daily News that the firm believes companies prefer to work with an entitity that has a presence in the nation’s capital to keep up with changes in federal regulation. In addition, according to Lathram, the firm does an extensive amount of work for clients dealing with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which is administered in Washington. “It was a carefully considered decision,” Lathram said, but “Ultimately, we decided it was a no-brainer."

Event Raises $8,6000 for Teen Court
The annual Mary Ann Williams Scholarship Benefit Dinner and Silent Auction raised $8,600 for the Sumner County Teen Court earlier this summer. The event honored Williams, who worked for 20 years with the Department of Children Services before becoming the program coordinator with the Sumner County Juvenile Court. While serving in that role, she was instrumental in starting the first teen court program in the state. Money raised at the event funds several college scholarships, which the court awards to teen participants. This past year, the court awarded $7,500 in scholarships. The evening also included the presentation of awards and a celebration of the program’s 10-year anniversary.Download an article about the event

Appeals Court Upholds Moncier's Suspension
The U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals "severely chastised" Knoxville lawyer Herb Moncier in an 11-page ruling released this week, according to the Knoxville News-Sentinel. The court takes issue with Moncier's repeated attempts to nullify an order that prohibits him from practicing in East Tennessee's federal courts. "It confounds the mind how Moncier (has) not come to grips with the fact that he has been disbarred from practice," Judge Danny Boggs wrote in a unanimous opinion from a three-judge panel of the court.

DA Candidates Discuss Juvenile Court Reform
Contenders for the Shelby County District Attorney General post addressed problems plaguing the Memphis Shelby County Juvenile Court at a forum on Monday. In discussing the Department of Justice's recent report about the court, Republican incumbent Amy Weirich focused on the lack of attention to victims of the system. "What is frustrating as a prosecutor of 21 years is that nowhere in that report does anyone mention the victims." She also defended the work being done to clean up the problems saying, "We're addressing those issues...In fact, we have a much more aggressive plan than the Department of Justice even asked us to accomplish." By contrast, Democratic challenger Carol Chumney maintained that the problems have been ongoing and persistent and "need to be dealt with." The Daily News reports

Budget Cuts Hit Legal Aid, Courts
Two news articles last week focused on the financial hardships hitting legal aid programs and courts around the country. The first, fromWRCB-TV, looked at the impact of a $5 million cut expected to hit Puerto Rico's Legal Services offices -– a reduction officials say will force attorneys to drop at least 7,000 civil cases. The second, fromNews Channel 5, focused on widespread layoffs in the Los Angeles County court system. Officials there say the cutbacks will affect 431 employees and 56 courtrooms. The budget-cutting plan also ends the county's innovative juvenile traffic courts, removes court reporters from civil trials and consolidates restraining order processing. With alot unkown about the future, one court clerk lamented that while the "commitment of our judicial officers and staff to preserve access to justice is unwavering…our ability to follow through on that commitment may soon be exhausted."

Committee Holds AG in Contempt
Adding to the mounting tensions between Congress and the Executive Branch, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted today to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt after President Barack Obama invoked executive privilege to withhold documents the committee was seeking. The contempt resolution now goes to the full House, where if approved, it could lead to federal charges.USA Today has a wrap up of the day's developments.

Scalia Releases Book on Textual Meaning
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. Garner (editor-in-chief of Black's Law Dictionary) this week released "Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts.” The book explores what textualism means, and spells out 70 canons, or guideposts, to explain the concept. Scalia said the goal of the book was to "help attorneys better understand how to present a client’s case...by better understanding how judges interpret cases.” It is the second major book on legal thinking and writing by the pair. In 2008 they authored "Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges." Learn more about the new book in the ABA Journal

Judges to Speak at Book Release
Tennessee Supreme Court Justice Gary Wade and Judge Rex Henry Ogle will deliver remarks next Saturday, June 30, at 6:30 p.m. at the King Family Library in Sevierville to support the release of a new book about the town. The book is the latest in the "Images of America" series by Arcadia Publishing. Learn more about the event in the News Sentinel

State Transportation Dept. Seeks Counsel
The Tennessee Department of Transportation is seeking to fill the position of Assistant General Counsel for the East Tennessee Region in its Knoxville office. Responsibilities include preparation of documents for the acquisition and disposal of highway rights-of-way, regulation of outdoor advertising, and general legal advice on various issues relating to the maintenance and operation of the state highway system. Applicants should submit a resume, cover letter, references, law school transcript and legal writing sample before July 16. Learn more on JobLink

MTSU Hiring Business Law Faculty
Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) is accepting applications for a full-time temporary (non-tenure-track) faculty position beginning August 2012. The successful candidate will have a specialty in business law and related areas and should have a law degree with relative experience. Interested individuals should apply online.  Review of applications will begin on July 1, and continue until the position is filled. Learn more on JobLink

 
 
Questions, comments: Email us at TBAToday@tnbar.org
About this publication: Today's News is a compilation of digests of news reports of interest to Tennessee lawyers compiled by TBA staff, links to digested press releases, and occasional stories about the TBA and other activities written by the TBA staff or members. Statements or opinions herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Tennessee Bar Association, its officers, board or staff.

© Copyright 2012 Tennessee Bar Association